| |
Home
About
Articles & Chapters
Conference Papers
Presentations
CMU Testbed
GWU 2004 Talks
Web Survey Results
Reports & Transcripts
Grant Proposals
Podcasts
Qualitative Data
Analysis
Program
eRulemaking Blog
Contact
Revised
05/12/2007
|
|
Peer Reviewed Journal Articles
-
Stuart W. Shulman,
“Whither Deliberation? Mass
e-Mail Campaigns and U.S. Regulatory Rulemaking” Journal of E-Government Vol. 3, No. 3 (2006), 41-64.
-
Stephen Zavestoski, Stuart Shulman, and David
Schlosberg, "Democracy and the Environment on the Internet: Electronic Citizen
Participation in Regulatory Rulemaking," Science, Technology & Human Values
Vol. 31, No. 4 (2006), 383-408.
-
Stuart W. Shulman,
“eRulemaking: Issues in
Current Research and Practice,” International Journal of Public Administration
Vol. 28 (2005), 621-641.
-
Stuart W. Shulman,
“The Internet Still Might
(but Probably Won’t) Change Everything,” I/S Journal Vol. 1, No. 1 (Winter
2005), 111-145.
-
Stuart Shulman, Jamie Callan, Eduard Hovy, and
Stephen Zavestoski,
“SGER Collaborative: A Testbed for eRulemaking Data,”
Journal of E-Government Vol. 1, No. 1. (2004), 123-127.
-
Stuart W. Shulman,
“An Experiment in Digital
Government at the United States National Organic Program,” Agriculture and
Human Values 20, 3 (Fall 2003), 253-265.
-
Stuart W. Shulman, David
Schlosberg, Stephen Zavestoski, and David Courard-Hauri,
“Electronic
Rulemaking: New Frontiers in Public Participation,” Social Science
Computer Review 21, 2 (Summer 2003), 162-178.
Peer Reviewed Book Chapters
-
David Schlosberg, Stuart Shulman, and Stephen
Zavestoski, “Virtual Environmental Citizenship: Web-Based Public Participation
on Environmental Rulemaking in the US,” in Dobson & Bell (Eds.) Environmental
Citizenship: Getting From Here to There (MIT Press, 2006), 207-236.
-
Stuart W. Shulman, Lisa Thrane, and Mack C.
Shelley, “eRulemaking,” in G. David Garson (Ed.) Handbook of Public
Information Systems 2nd Ed. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005), 237-254.
This research project was initiated
during the fall 1999 semester and was made possible with the following grants
from the National
Science Foundation: IIS-0429293 “Collaborative Research: Language
Processing Technology for Electronic Rulemaking,“ EIA-00328914 “SGER
COLLABORATIVE: A Testbed for eRulemaking Data,” SES-0322662 “Democracy and
E-Rulemaking: Comparing Traditional vs. Electronic Comment from a Discursive
Democratic Framework,“ and EIA-0089892 “SGER: Citizen Agenda-Setting in the
Regulatory Process: Electronic Collection and Synthesis of Public Commentary.”
|
 |
Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those
of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the National Science Foundation.
|
|
|